RWA Tokenization Platform Comparison Tool
Compare popular RWA tokenization platforms to find the best fit for your investment or business needs. Select the platforms you want to compare and see detailed comparisons of their features, market focus, and key strengths.
Select Platforms to Compare
RWA Platform Comparison
| Criteria | Mintology | Securitize | MANTRA Chain | S-PRO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Specialization | Commercial Real Estate | Security Tokens | Institutional Compliance | End-to-End Services |
| Blockchain | Ethereum, Polygon | Ethereum | MANTRA Chain (L1) | Ethereum |
| Key Strength | Integration with property management systems | Deep broker-dealer network integration | Regulatory-first design, built-in KYC/AML | European regulatory compliance |
| Market Focus | Global | North America | EMEA | Europe |
| Regulatory Compliance | Good (US focus) | Strong (North America) | Excellent (Regulatory-first) | Excellent (EU-specific) |
| Liquidity | Moderate (Real Estate focus) | High (Institutional) | Medium (EMEA) | Low (EU-specific) |
| Cost to Tokenize | $$ (Moderate) | $$$ (High) | $$ (Moderate) | $$$ (High) |
Tip: For global investors, Mintology offers the broadest market coverage but may have limited regulatory compliance outside specific regions. For EU investors, S-PRO's European compliance makes it the strongest choice. MANTRA's regulatory-first approach is ideal for institutions seeking compliance certainty.
Imagine owning a piece of a Manhattan skyscraper for $500. Or investing in a wind farm in Germany without needing millions in capital. This isn’t science fiction - it’s happening right now through RWA tokenization. Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization platforms are turning physical assets like real estate, machinery, bonds, and even royalties into digital tokens on a blockchain. These tokens can be bought, sold, and traded like crypto, but they represent something tangible. The result? Fractional ownership, faster settlements, and global access to assets that were once locked away in bank vaults and legal contracts.
What Exactly Is RWA Tokenization?
RWA tokenization means taking something real - a building, a loan, a piece of art - and creating a digital version of its ownership on a blockchain. Each token stands for a share of that asset. If a $10 million office building is split into 10,000 tokens, each token equals $1,000 of ownership. You can buy one, ten, or a thousand. No need to buy the whole thing. This isn’t just about making assets easier to trade. It’s about fixing broken systems. Traditional real estate deals take weeks. Bonds settle in days. With tokenization, trades happen in seconds. Liquidity, which used to be a luxury for big institutions, is now available to everyday investors. And because these tokens live on public ledgers, ownership is transparent and impossible to forge. The magic happens through smart contracts - self-executing code that enforces rules automatically. Want dividends paid out monthly? The contract does it. Need to verify an investor is accredited? The system checks KYC before allowing a purchase. No middlemen. No paperwork piles.How RWA Tokenization Works: The 6-Step Process
Tokenizing an asset isn’t as simple as hitting a button. It’s a multi-step legal and technical process. Here’s how it actually works:- Asset Selection - Pick what you want to tokenize. Real estate is the most common (62% of all RWA tokens), followed by commodities like gold and oil, private credit, and intellectual property like music royalties.
- Legal Structure - You can’t just slap a token on a building. A Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) is created - a legal entity that owns the asset and issues the tokens. This keeps the blockchain side separate from the real-world ownership.
- Token Minting - Digital tokens are created on a blockchain, usually Ethereum or Polygon. These follow standards like ERC-20, meaning they’re compatible with wallets and exchanges.
- Smart Contract Setup - Rules are coded in: who can buy, how dividends are distributed, how transfers are approved, and which jurisdictions are allowed. Oracles (like Chainlink) feed real-time data - property values, interest rates - into the contract.
- Token Distribution - Tokens are offered to investors through regulated platforms. Retail investors might buy via apps like RealT; institutions use platforms like Securitize.
- Secondary Trading - Once issued, tokens can be traded on compliant marketplaces 24/7. No more waiting for quarter-end closings.
Top RWA Tokenization Platforms Compared
Not all platforms are built the same. Here’s how the leaders stack up:| Platform | Founded | Specialization | Blockchain | Key Strength | Market Focus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mintology | 2021 | Commercial Real Estate | Ethereum, Polygon | Integration with property management systems | Global |
| Securitize | 2017 | Security Tokens | Ethereum | Deep broker-dealer network integration | North America |
| MANTRA Chain | 2019 | Institutional Compliance | MANTRA Chain (L1) | Regulatory-first design, built-in KYC/AML | EMEA |
| S-PRO | 2016 | End-to-End Services | Ethereum | European regulatory compliance | Europe |
Why This Matters: Real Benefits
The advantages aren’t theoretical. They’re happening right now:- Fractional Ownership - You can own 0.01% of a $50 million portfolio. That’s impossible in traditional markets.
- 24/7 Trading - No more waiting for markets to open. Buy a token at 3 a.m. in Wellington, and it settles instantly.
- Faster Settlements - Traditional real estate deals take 30-60 days. Tokenized trades settle in minutes.
- Automated Payouts - Dividends, rent, or interest are distributed automatically. No more chasing checks.
- Global Access - An investor in Manila can buy into a Tokyo office building without cross-border banking hurdles.
The Downside: Risks and Real Challenges
This isn’t a magic wand. There are serious hurdles:- Regulatory Fragmentation - The U.S. has state-by-state rules. Europe has MiCA. Switzerland is crypto-friendly. Singapore has Project Guardian. One platform can’t be compliant everywhere. That’s why most platforms launch in one region first.
- Limited Liquidity - Real estate tokens might trade daily. But a tokenized machine tool? Average daily volume is under $50,000. You might not find a buyer when you want to sell.
- High Costs - Legal and compliance setup costs $100,000-$300,000+. For a $5 million asset, that’s a huge upfront hit.
- Custody Issues - Who holds the actual building or gold bar? Platforms use third-party custodians, but if they fail, the token might be worthless.
- Tax Confusion - Is a tokenized bond a security? A commodity? A foreign asset? Tax authorities haven’t caught up. 52% of users report headaches here.
Who’s Using This and Why?
Adoption is growing fast - but mostly by institutions:- Asset Managers - 73 of the top 100 global asset managers have RWA pilots. They use it to unlock trapped capital and create new product lines.
- Private Companies - Startups use tokenization to raise funds without giving up equity. Instead of selling shares, they sell tokens backed by future revenue.
- Investors - Retail investors on platforms like RealT are buying $500 slices of New York apartments. Reddit users praise the access - but complain about low trading volume.
What’s Next? The Road Ahead
The ecosystem is maturing. In March 2024, MANTRA launched its own Layer 1 blockchain built for RWAs. Chainlink rolled out CCIP 2.0, making it easier to move tokenized assets across chains. The International Token Standardization Association released Version 3.0 of its RWA standard, mandating 14 compliance fields for legal enforceability. SWIFT, the global banking network, is testing integration with RWA platforms. If successful, you could settle a tokenized asset trade in euros or dollars without ever touching crypto. Gartner predicts that by 2026, 10% of Fortune 500 companies will have tokenized at least one major asset. But only 35% of those will achieve real liquidity. That’s the gap between hype and reality. Deloitte says there’s an 85% chance RWA tokenization becomes a $10 trillion market by 2030. But that depends on regulators stepping up. If the U.S. and EU don’t harmonize rules, growth stalls.Is This for You?
If you’re an investor looking to diversify beyond stocks and crypto, RWA tokenization offers exposure to real assets with lower entry points. But don’t jump in blindly. Look for platforms with:- Clear legal structure (SPV, audited backing)
- Regulatory compliance in your country
- Chainlink or similar oracle integration
- Proven track record - not just a whitepaper
What assets can be tokenized?
Almost any physical or financial asset can be tokenized. The most common are commercial real estate, private credit (like business loans), commodities (gold, oil), intellectual property (music, patents), and even fine art. Infrastructure assets like solar farms and toll roads are also being tested. The key is having a clear ownership structure and legal rights that can be mapped to a digital token.
Can I buy RWA tokens as a retail investor?
Yes, but with limits. Platforms like RealT, Mintology, and Securitize allow retail investors to buy tokens in real estate and other assets, often starting at $10-$500. However, many platforms restrict access based on investor accreditation (income or net worth). Always check local regulations - some countries ban retail access to tokenized securities entirely.
Are RWA tokens the same as cryptocurrencies?
No. Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Ethereum are native digital assets with no underlying physical value. RWA tokens represent ownership in real-world assets - a building, a loan, a machine. They’re more like digital shares of a company than digital money. Their value comes from the asset they represent, not speculation.
What’s the biggest risk in RWA tokenization?
The biggest risk is regulatory uncertainty. If a government decides the token doesn’t legally represent ownership, or if the SPV is challenged in court, your token could become worthless - even if the asset still exists. Custody risk (who holds the real asset?) and smart contract bugs are also serious, but regulators are the wild card.
How do I know if a platform is trustworthy?
Look for: 1) Audited legal structure (SPV with independent custodians), 2) Regulatory licenses (like a broker-dealer or trust license), 3) Use of Chainlink or other proven oracles, 4) Transparent asset backing reports, and 5) User reviews from institutional clients. Avoid platforms that don’t explain how the real asset is protected.
Is RWA tokenization just for rich people?
Not anymore. While institutional use dominates, retail investors can now access tokenized real estate for under $500. Platforms like RealT let you buy a fraction of a property in Texas or Arizona. But high-value assets like private equity or infrastructure still require large capital. The democratization is real - but still early.
What happens if the platform shuts down?
Your tokens usually remain valid because they’re on the blockchain - not controlled by the platform. The legal ownership tied to the SPV still exists. But if the platform was the only place trading the tokens, liquidity disappears. You still own the asset, but you might not be able to sell it easily. Always check if tokens are transferable to other wallets or exchanges.
Lisa Hubbard
November 23, 2025 AT 15:23Look, I get the hype, but let’s be real - most of these platforms are just rebranding old private equity deals with blockchain buzzwords. I checked RealT last year, tried to buy a $500 slice of a Detroit house, and the dividend payout took three months. Three months. And the property was listed as 'vacant' for 18 months straight. The tech looks slick, but the real world doesn’t move at crypto speed. I’m not mad, just tired of being sold a dream that needs a lawyer and a miracle to work.
Also, why does every platform claim to use Chainlink? It’s like everyone’s using the same PowerPoint template. I’m not convinced any of them actually tested the oracle under real market stress. Just saying.
And don’t get me started on tax forms. I spent two hours on TurboTax last year trying to figure out if my tokenized wind farm share counted as 'foreign income.' It didn’t even have a country code. Just a blockchain address. That’s not finance. That’s a glitch.
I’m not against innovation. But when your 'revolution' requires me to hire a compliance consultant just to buy a $200 token, maybe we’re overcomplicating things.
Also, why is every RWA platform headquartered in the U.S. or EU? What about the rest of the world? I live in a country where crypto is legal, but tokenized assets are still in gray zone. Guess I’m just not important enough for your 'global access' pitch.
Don’t get me wrong - I’d love to own part of a solar farm. But I’d rather wait till someone actually fixes the legal mess before I hand over my cash.
And no, I don’t want to hear about 'decentralized governance.' I just want my rent check to show up on time.
Anyway. I’m done. I’ll stick to ETFs. At least they have customer service.
And yes, I know I’m being lazy. But someone’s gotta say it.
Also, who’s auditing the custodians? I’m not sleeping well thinking about some offshore firm holding the deed to my 'fractional skyscraper.'
TL;DR: Cool idea. Terrible execution. Still waiting for the real thing.
Julissa Patino
November 24, 2025 AT 01:04U S of A owns the future not some EU compliance nightmare or some Indian blockchain startup with 3 devs and a dream
Securitize is the only legit player period end of story
Mantra chain is just a glorified private ledger with a fancy name
And dont even get me started on mintology they cant even spell property right on their site
if you buy anything outside usa you are just funding some offshore tax dodge
real estate is american property is american money is american
why are we letting europe dictate how we invest
miCA is just a power grab by bureaucrats who dont understand tech
chainlink is fine but only if its running on ethereum which is the only real blockchain
other chains are just playgrounds for people who dont know what theyre doing
if your token isnt on eth its not real
and dont even mention polygon its just a sidechain for people too lazy to pay gas
if you think you can invest in a german wind farm from india you are delusional
the system is rigged and only americans win
end of discussion
Omkar Rane
November 25, 2025 AT 13:54Interesting read, but I feel like the real story here is how slowly the legal systems are catching up. In India, we’ve got a ton of small farmers and artisans who could benefit from tokenizing their land or crafts - but the moment you mention blockchain, everyone freezes. The tax office doesn’t know what to do with it. Banks won’t touch it. Even the local notary has never heard of an SPV.
I tried explaining this to my uncle who owns a small textile unit. He was excited until I said ‘smart contract’ and he asked if it was a new kind of sewing machine.
Technology is ahead of culture here. We have the people, we have the assets, we just don’t have the framework. And no amount of Chainlink or Ethereum will fix that.
Also, I love that you mentioned retail access. My cousin in Kerala bought $100 worth of a tokenized spice farm last month. She gets updates via WhatsApp. No app. No KYC portal. Just a PDF and a QR code. It’s messy. But it’s working.
Maybe the future isn’t in fancy platforms. Maybe it’s in people just figuring it out on their own.
Also, the tax confusion? Yeah. I spent three months trying to figure out if my tokenized tea shares were ‘agricultural income’ or ‘capital gains.’ The government finally said ‘we don’t know.’ That’s not progress. That’s just silence.
Still, I’m rooting for it. Slowly. Carefully. With a lot of chai.
Daryl Chew
November 25, 2025 AT 18:52They’re not tokenizing assets. They’re tokenizing debt. And the government knows it. That’s why they’re letting this happen - because it’s a backdoor to privatizing public wealth.
Think about it. Every time someone buys a tokenized building, they’re not buying bricks and mortar. They’re buying a legal loophole that lets Wall Street bypass zoning laws, rent controls, and tenant protections.
Who’s holding the deed? A shell company in Delaware. Who’s paying the property taxes? The city. Who’s getting evicted when the rent goes up? The working class.
And don’t tell me about ‘fractional ownership.’ That’s just code for ‘you’ll never get to live there.’
Chainlink? That’s just a spy tool. Every price feed is monitored by the same firms that run the Fed. You think they’re not tracking every transaction? You think your $500 slice of a Manhattan building isn’t being used to map your spending habits?
This isn’t finance. It’s surveillance with a blockchain logo.
And the worst part? People are cheering for it. They think they’re getting rich. They’re just becoming data points in a corporate playbook.
Mark my words - five years from now, you’ll be paying rent to a crypto hedge fund that bought your neighborhood with tokenized bonds.
They’re not democratizing finance. They’re weaponizing it.
And you’re handing them the keys.
Gus Mitchener
November 26, 2025 AT 23:02What we’re witnessing here isn’t just tokenization - it’s the ontological shift of ownership itself. The blockchain doesn’t merely represent an asset; it reifies the legal fiction of property into a computable state.
The SPV is not a legal entity - it’s a protocol. The token isn’t a share - it’s a state transition in a distributed ledger that encodes fiduciary duty via Turing-complete code.
What we’re seeing is the collapse of the juridical subject into the algorithmic agent. The investor no longer holds a claim - they participate in a consensus mechanism that validates entitlement.
This is Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, but with Solidity.
And yet - the ontological weight of the physical asset remains. The building still stands. The gold is still mined. The oil is still pumped. The blockchain merely mirrors, but never replaces, the material substrate.
So is this emancipation? Or is it a new form of alienation - where the owner no longer touches the object, but only its digital shadow?
The oracle is the new priest. Chainlink, the new church. And we, the faithful, bow before the price feed.
It’s beautiful. And terrifying.
And nobody’s talking about it.
Except me.
Soham Kulkarni
November 27, 2025 AT 01:47Hey, just wanted to say I’ve been following RWA for a while and I really appreciate how detailed this post is.
As someone from India, I’ve seen how hard it is to get small investors into real assets. Even if you have the money, the paperwork is insane. One friend tried to invest in a commercial plot and spent 14 months just getting signatures.
Tokenization could be a game-changer here - if we fix the trust issue. People here don’t trust blockchain because they don’t understand it. They think it’s all scams.
But if platforms start partnering with local cooperatives or microfinance groups, we could actually make this work for people who need it most.
Also, I think the biggest win isn’t the tech - it’s the fact that now, a college student in Pune can own part of a solar panel in Gujarat. That’s powerful.
Just don’t let the big players take over and make it exclusive again. Keep it simple. Keep it local.
And please, someone explain tax rules in plain English. I still don’t know if I owe 10% or 20% on my tokenized rice farm shares.
Thanks for writing this. Really helpful.
Tejas Kansara
November 27, 2025 AT 21:14Good breakdown. One thing missing: liquidity traps.
Tokenized assets look great on paper. But if no one’s trading them, they’re just digital stickers.
Start small. Pick one asset. Buy one token. See if you can sell it next week.
If you can’t - walk away.
Don’t get caught in the ‘future of finance’ hype.
Real wealth is liquid.
Most RWA tokens aren’t.
Just saying.
Rajesh pattnaik
November 28, 2025 AT 22:38Interesting to see how this is playing out globally. In India, we’ve got a lot of small-scale farmers and artisans who could benefit from tokenization - but the real barrier isn’t tech, it’s trust. People don’t understand blockchain, and they’re scared of losing what little they have.
Also, I’ve noticed that most platforms ignore non-English speakers. No Hindi, Tamil, Bengali interfaces. Just English. That’s a huge gap.
And taxes? Don’t even ask. The government still hasn’t decided if a tokenized goat is a livestock asset or a digital security.
Still, I’m hopeful. If we can get local NGOs and cooperatives involved, this could actually empower people instead of just enriching VCs.
Let’s not make the same mistakes we made with crypto exchanges.
Belle Bormann
November 30, 2025 AT 05:22Okay so i tried to buy a tokenized apartment on realt and it was a mess
the website said $500 but then there was a 12% fee and then i had to do kyc and then it said my state blocked it
so i gave up
also the property was in detroit and the photo looked like it was taken in 2008
not impressed
maybe its better for rich people
but for normal folks? nope
Dave Sorrell
December 1, 2025 AT 18:36While the technological framework of RWA tokenization is compelling, the legal and regulatory infrastructure remains critically underdeveloped. The disconnect between digital token issuance and real-world asset custody introduces systemic counterparty risk that is not adequately addressed by current market participants.
Moreover, the assumption that blockchain inherently enhances liquidity is empirically unfounded in the early-stage markets. Most tokenized real estate assets exhibit bid-ask spreads exceeding 15%, with turnover rates lower than those of private equity funds.
Until regulatory clarity is established - particularly regarding tax treatment, cross-border enforcement, and investor protection - RWA tokenization remains a high-risk speculative endeavor disguised as financial innovation.
Investors must approach this space with the same rigor as they would any unregistered security offering.
Sky Sky Report blog
December 3, 2025 AT 00:37I appreciate the depth of this post but I think we’re missing the human side of this
Who’s actually benefiting here? Is it the person in Manila buying a slice of Tokyo real estate? Or is it the institutional investor who can afford the $200k legal setup?
And what happens when the platform disappears? The token lives on the chain but the building still needs maintenance, taxes, insurance
Who pays for that?
Is the SPV just a legal shell with no real responsibility?
It’s beautiful in theory but I worry we’re building a house on sand
And I don’t think we’ve even begun to ask the ethical questions
What if tokenized assets become the new gated communities?
Just wondering
stuart white
December 4, 2025 AT 21:09Okay but let’s be honest - this isn’t finance. It’s performance art for billionaires who want to feel like they’re part of the future while still living in their 12,000-square-foot McMansion with a private elevator.
You think you’re owning a piece of a wind farm? No. You’re owning a line of code that says ‘you own 0.0003% of a wind farm.’
Meanwhile, the actual wind farm is being managed by a contractor in Germany who doesn’t give a damn about your token.
And if the contract gets hacked? Your ‘asset’ vanishes. Poof.
Chainlink isn’t magic. It’s just a glorified API with a fancy name.
And the fact that you’re all excited about this while your own rent went up 40% this year? That’s the real joke.
This isn’t democratization. It’s distraction.
They’re selling you a dream so you stop asking why your paycheck hasn’t moved since 2015.
Wake up.
This is the new pyramid scheme. With NFTs.
Jenny Charland
December 6, 2025 AT 18:57OMG I just bought a $200 token on RealT and it’s already up 12% in 3 days 😍
THIS IS THE FUTURE BABY
YOU’RE ALL JUST HATERS BECAUSE YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND WEB3
THEY’RE COMING FOR YOUR HOUSE NEXT
GET IN NOW OR BE LEFT BEHIND 😤
also who’s the idiot who said liquidity is low? I sold mine in 12 hours 💸
LOL you guys are so behind
just buy more
and stop being salty
you’re not rich because you’re not brave
💎✨
preet kaur
December 7, 2025 AT 02:06Really liked how you broke this down. I’ve been watching this space for a while, especially from India.
One thing I’ve noticed - most platforms ignore non-Western markets. But imagine if a small farmer in Bihar could tokenize his land rights and get funding from someone in Canada. That’s real impact.
Also, the legal part is messy everywhere. Here, even basic property records are handwritten. How are we supposed to tokenize that?
Maybe the answer isn’t in fancy blockchains - but in simple, local solutions.
Like SMS-based tokens. Or QR codes linked to village records.
It’s not sexy. But it might work.
Just a thought.
Emily Michaelson
December 8, 2025 AT 04:46I’ve been researching this for months. The tech is solid. The real problem is custody and legal enforceability.
Platforms say ‘your token represents ownership’ - but if the SPV goes bankrupt, or the custodian disappears, do you have any legal recourse?
Most jurisdictions don’t recognize blockchain ownership as equivalent to paper title.
So technically, you own a digital file. Not a building.
That’s a huge gap.
Also, insurance? No one talks about insurance.
What if the building burns down? Does your token still pay rent?
And what if the oracle feeds wrong data? You get paid based on fake prices?
There’s so much risk hidden behind the shiny UI.
Just because it’s on a blockchain doesn’t mean it’s safe.
Do your homework. Don’t trust the marketing.
asher malik
December 9, 2025 AT 13:48Okay so...
Tokenization is cool.
But what if the building gets condemned?
What if the asset is fraudulently represented?
What if the SPV is a shell company registered in the Caymans?
What if the smart contract has a bug?
What if the government freezes all token transfers?
What if the oracle goes down during a market crash?
What if the platform gets hacked?
What if the token is classified as a security retroactively?
What if you’re in a country where crypto is illegal?
What if your wallet gets lost?
What if the person who holds the actual deed dies?
What if the custodian is a front for a money-laundering ring?
What if the ‘fractional ownership’ is just a fancy way of saying ‘you have no voting rights’?
What if...
...you’re just buying a digital dream?
Just saying.
Not against it.
Just... asking questions.
That’s all.
jocelyn cortez
December 10, 2025 AT 06:47I think people are too focused on the tech and not enough on the people.
Who’s getting left out?
What about elderly homeowners who don’t use smartphones?
What about communities that rely on local property taxes?
What about renters who can’t afford to buy in?
Tokenization might make assets liquid - but does it make them fair?
I’m not saying it’s bad.
I’m just wondering if we’re building a system that helps everyone - or just the ones who already have access.
And if it’s the latter...
Are we really improving anything?
Kathy Alexander
December 11, 2025 AT 12:40Oh wow. Another ‘blockchain will fix everything’ article. How original.
Let me guess - you also think NFTs are the future of art and Bitcoin is digital gold?
Newsflash: the only thing being tokenized here is gullibility.
Every single ‘RWA’ platform is a regulatory loophole wrapped in a whitepaper.
And the fact that you think ‘fractional ownership’ is democratization is laughable.
It’s just Wall Street’s new way of selling the same old debt to retail suckers who don’t know the difference between a bond and a blockchain.
And don’t even mention ‘24/7 trading’ - there’s no liquidity. You think you can sell your tokenized parking lot in Kansas at 3 a.m.? Good luck.
This isn’t innovation. It’s financial snake oil.
And you’re buying it.
Congratulations.
David Hardy
December 12, 2025 AT 05:55Bro. This is it. This is the future.
I bought a $300 token in a solar farm in Arizona last week.
Got my first payout yesterday. $1.20.
It’s not much.
But it’s mine.
And I didn’t need a bank.
And I didn’t need a broker.
And I didn’t need to wait 60 days.
It just happened.
That’s power.
Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.
Get in.
Start small.
But get in.
This is the new American Dream.
And it’s on-chain.
🚀
Lisa Hubbard
December 14, 2025 AT 02:43David Hardy - your comment made me laugh. $1.20. That’s your dividend?
Let me guess - you’re also ‘investing’ in 17 other tokenized assets.
How’s your portfolio doing?
And did you check if the solar farm actually produces what the oracle says it does?
Or are you just trusting a website that says ‘your energy is clean’?
Also - who maintains the panels?
Who pays for the cleaning?
Who fixes it when it breaks?
And if the operator goes bankrupt - does your $1.20 still come?
Or is it just a line of code that says ‘pay me’?
I’m not saying you’re wrong.
I’m just saying - don’t confuse hope with income.
And if you’re proud of $1.20…
you might want to reconsider your life choices.